The effect of row number on clinical and life quality outcomes of patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Objective: Shoulder pain and disability are mostly seen following rotator cuff rupture. Arthroscopic repair becomes a gold standard treatment for rupture when conservative fails. Comparing functional results, retear rates reoperation of arthroscopic in terms single-row versus double row techniques is our aim this study. 
 Material Method: Overall, 174 surgery patients were specified into 2 groups. Group 1 consists 81 underwent group 93 consisted transosseos equivalent technique row. We evaluated demographic data American Elbow Surgeons, Constant Murley, Visual analogue scale 36-item Short Form subscale scores.
 Results: Mean follow-up time was 14.08±4.77 months. ASES, CM VAS ARCR similar between two Some SF-36 score improvements after operation significantly better 2; role limitations due to physical health (p = 0.041), energy/fatigue 0.026), emotional well-being 0.017), 0.010), general 0.037). Re-rupture different. In re-rupture rate 13.6% it 1.1% 0.001).
 Conclusion: Lower rates, improved quality life outcomes at short-term can be obtained by double-row repair. suggest that the considered who have medium large tears lower some outcomes.